| In
part one of this article I
suggested some general steps you
might want to follow in choosing
a free service to display videos
on your web site. In this second
part I want to discuss a few of
the major video services in
greater depth. Hopefully the
items I mention will give you
some ideas on what to look at if
you end up evaluating other
services as well. YouTube
YouTube is currently the most
popular video hosting service. As
the most popular service, it is
also the most widely supported by
third party sites. YouTube has
extensive help screens, a help
forum, and a customizable embed
code generator which allows you
to specify colors, border or
borderless, and whether or not to
show a "related videos"
list. If your main concern is to
have the widest possible audience
for your videos with the least
amount of effort on your part,
Youtube is probably a good way to
go.
Given the fact
that YouTube has the vast
resources of Google behind it,
you probably don't have to worry
that the site will disappear any
time soon. That might not be true
for some of the other sites in
the video hosting area.
YouTube does
have a length limit of 10
minutes. So if you make two hour
epics and would not want to
consider breaking them into
smaller segments, you will want
to look elsewhere. You can
potentially earn a share of
advertisement revenue from videos
uploaded to YouTube if you are
accepted into the Youtube
Partners program. As mentioned on
the YouTube Partners page, however, a
qualification for being accepted
into the program is that:
You
regularly upload videos that
are viewed by thousands of
YouTube users.
That's a
significant hurdle for many video
creators.
Revver
When it came to
sharing ad revenue with video
creators, Revver was in the vanguard. In
addition to being among the very
first to pay a share of ad
revenue to video creators, Revver
offers to pay 20% of the ad
revenue for sharing the videos of
others. So even if you don't have
any videos of your own, there's
the potential opportunity to make
money by embedding other people's
videos on your site.
The Revver site
does not get as many visitors as
YouTube. It does, however, offer
a lot of tools for building your
own audience. There is a tool
which will generate either embed
code or Javascript for either
Flash or Quicktime. There is also
the capacity to create playlists
(collections) of videos (yours,
other peoples, or a combination).
You can manually choose the
videos that go in a playlist or
set a criteria to automatically
populate the playlist. Once you
have created your playlists, you
can embed the playlist in your
site (or elsewhere) using
Revver's customizable
"playlist widget".
Revver also has an API (applications
programming interface) which can
be used to go beyond the basic
tools that Revver offers. If you
need some help with the api (or
other aspects of Revver), you can
visit the Revver forums.
Unfortunately,
in addition to all of the good
and innovative features of
Revver, there are some real
negatives as well. Technical
glitches have been far too
frequent, especially lately
(problems with statistics, the
Revver site going down at times,
slow loading videos, people with
Time Warner/Road Runner ISPs not
being able to view Revver videos
at all).
Worse, Revver
has failed to pay the amounts
they owe users for quite a number
of weeks. Similar problems, it
seems, have been reported by the
users of some of the other
companies owned by Live Universe
(which acquired Revver back in
February 2008), such as Peerflix.
Understandably, this has caused
great concern among Revver users.
This post in Eric D. Snider's Blog, makes for interesting
reading. If the account he
relates is accurate (and I have
not seen anyone alleging that it
is not), it certainly does not
inspire a great deal of
confidence in Live Universe.
Update
12/10/2008: Earlier this week
Revver finally paid its users the
amounts that were due in August.
Hopefully this indicates an
intention on the part of Revver's
parent company, Live Universe, to
work towards fully resolving the
matter. Time will tell.
Blip
After became
concerned about Revver's future
in light of the problems I cited
above, I searched for the best
alternative I could find among
the various video services that
share ad revenue. Blip (that's Blip.TV, not
Blip.com), for a variety of
reasons, was the one that I
chose.
In my
experience so far Blip compares
very favorably with Revver in
terms of techological
reliability. All of the videos I
uploaded to Blip were up and
running in an hour or less
(usually much less) compared to
hours or even days when uploading
the same videos to Revver.
Moreover, I have not experienced
any of the all too common
glitches which I mentioned have
been plaguing Revver. Like
Revver, Blip has an API (actually two of them) for developers.
Blip pays its
users their share of the ad
revenue quarterly, rather than
Revver's specified monthly. On
the other hand, I have not seen
any reports of Blip failing to
pay on time.
There are a few
significant areas where Blip does
not yet equal Revver:
- Blip does
not currently offer users
a share of ad revenue for
sharing other people's
videos.
- Some video
sharing services and/or
forums offer support for
Revver videos but not for
those of Blip. This could
change, however,
especially if the
problems I cited at
Revver continue. For
example, one of my
favorite video forums, MyVidsRock.com, once supported
Revver videos only but
now has support for Blip
(and others) as well.
- Blip does
not have its own help
forum.
Conclusion
If it were not
for the payment problems,
frequent glitches, and the
related uncertainty, Revver would
be my first choice for hosting
videos. Revver still has a lot of
great features, but at this point
my number one choice is Blip.
They don't do quite as much, but
what they do they do exceedingly
well.
Of course,
there is no law that says you
have to go with one and only one
video service. In my own case, I
host a number of my own videos at
both Blip and Revver (and I'll
probably get around to trying
some of them out at YouTube as
well).
In addition to
the added exposure (and possibly
added revenue) from using more
than one service it's nice to
have a little variety in video
hosts so that if one of them
crashes utterly, goes out of
business, etc., you don't have to
totally start from scratch in the
video area. Also, some services
may be more appropriate for a
particular video or may have
better embed features for a
particular site or blog.
Diversification is good!
|